![]() ![]() In the months leading up to the laptop story, the FBI advised senior Twitter executives to question the validity of any Hunter Biden story. Twitter’s censorship of a news article that shed light on Joe Biden’s involvement in his family’s suspicious business deals. That brings us to the specific topic of today’s hearing. We now know all this thanks to Elon Musk and the independent journalists who have contributed to what are known as the Twitter files. The federal government used to accomplish what it constitutionally cannot limit the free exercise of speech. Twitter under the leadership of our witnesses today, was a private company. ![]() It worked hand in hand with the FBI to monitor the protected speech of Americans receiving millions of tax dollars to do so. He said this in front of Congress in 2018, but we now know they did.Įven placing such accounts on search and trend back list, Twitter’s employees made censorship decisions on the fly, often not following the company’s own policy, publicly stated policies. In the past, Twitter’s leadership including previous CEO Jack Dorsey claimed the company did not limit the visibility of certain accounts and tweets known as shadow banning. In fact, Twitter’s previous management team deplatformed and suppressed not just conservative voices, but anyone whose opinions strayed from what they deemed acceptable opinions such as that students could and should attend school in person to curb learning loss. This includes shadow banning locking accounts and banning accounts altogether. Musk take over the company, Twitter aggressively suppressed conservative elected officials, journalists and activists. Many of these actions were carried out by the witnesses before us today prior to Mr. In this hearing, we’ll examine the actions taken by Twitter prior to Mr. ![]() He has pledged to allow Americans’ voices be heard, not quashed. Musk is pledged to end censorship that goes beyond the law. Twitter was once one of these platforms until Elon Musk purchased the company a few months ago. We’ve witnessed big tech autocrats willed their unchecked power to suppress the speech of Americans to promote their preferred political opinions. However many social media platforms are under the control of people who are hostile to the fundamental American principles of free speech and expression protected in the US Constitution. These platforms are the virtual town square. Social media platforms are increasingly the place Americans go to express their views, debate issues, and gather news and information. Today’s hearing is the House Oversight and Accountability Committee’s first step in examining the coordination between the federal government and big tech to restrict speech and interfere in the democratic process. ![]() I recognize myself for the purpose of making an opening statement. Without objection, the chair may declare a recess at any time. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability will come to order. Check quotes against the video of the hearing before reproducing. Safety Policy Team, Twitter ( Opening statement) Yoel Roth, Former Global Head of Trust & Safety, Twitter ( Opening statement).James Baker, Former Deputy General Counsel, Twitter ( Opening statement).Vijaya Gadde, Former Chief Legal Officer, Twitter ( Opening statement).Jamie Raskin (D-MD) hosted a hearing titled “ Protecting Speech from Government Interference and Social Media Bias, Part 1: Twitter’s Role in Suppressing the Biden Laptop Story.” James Comer (R-KY) and ranking member Rep. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, led by Chair Rep. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |